WHY?
Filed under: Development, Economics, Education, Maryland, Public Safety, Wicomico Politics
If you were Wicomico County and you could gain no real benefit from Salisbury annexing land, WHY would you?
Now I know that many of you (particularly developers) will tell us all about the increased revenue from property taxes. This is true – if you are the city of Salisbury. What benefit does Wicomico County receive?
With the revenue cap in place, total revenue from property taxes may only rise 2% per year. During the years when a large scale development such as Aydolette Farms or the proposed old mall property comes on line, Wicomico County’s property tax revenue will not be able to take in all of the new revenue that would have been received from the new homes. Instead they will be forced to lower the property tax rate. However most, if not all of these new homes will have children. Their parents will expect them to be educated. Even the homes without children will have at least one car. Most will have more than one. The cars will travel on roads that the county must maintain.
No, my name is not Tony Sarbanes. No, I am not arguing for a repeal of the revenue cap. I am arguing for a sane fiscal policy in Wicomico County. This means that you can’t allow wanton development through annexation. The county simply cannot afford it.
If we were talking about non-retail commercial development it would be a different story. Commercial development means jobs. Commercial development means tax revenue. Commercial properties use far less in services than they pay in property taxes (on average). Residential property uses up more in services than it pays in property taxes (on average).
Each time the county rezones a plot of ground so that Salisbury can annex without the developer having to wait for five years, the county is losing money (if it is for residential development). Salisbury is making out like a bandit. The county is getting killed.
Forget the quality of life arguments. Forget the effect on the environment. Forget the impact on our children. Forget the impact on infrastructure. This is a straight dollars and cents financial argument. WHY is Wicomico County entering into transactions from which its citizens will derive no economic benefit each and every time?
What is the solution?
First, the county needs to stop all rezoning to residential. Not a moratorium. Not a temporary halt. It needs to just tell everyone involved not even to bother applying to rezone a piece of property to any residential zoning. Yes, I know that the developers are going to scream, but that’s tough s**t. If the county council doesn’t take this first step the results will be criminal.
Second, the county needs to start working on a plan to get out of the mess that they are in. This should include public forums with participation from citizens, developers, business people, non-profits, and any experts that they can round up. There should be ground rules. The first time someone proposes to lift the ban on rezoning until the problems have been solved you cut them off. The first time someone yells, screams, uses one of the seven dirty words, or launches an ad hominem attack, they go. Since it’s doubtful that anyone on County Council has the stones to enforce rules like this, they should get someone else to moderate.
This will not be a short process. There will need to be multiple meetings. Several meetings need to be focused just on the expense side of the budget. Once the Council has had the opportunity to gather ideas and prioritize them it’s time to make some decisions. That means open debate and leaving one’s party affiliation at the door. This will be most important!
It’s relatively easy to sit there and do nothing. I guess all of the present members are assuming that when this blows up (and it will), they will either be off of council or they can blame it on (pick one: the Democrats, the Republicans, the Communists, VOICE, the developers, Tony Sarbanes, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, or the Devil).
WRONG! When this blows up the blame rests squarely on Tony Sarbanes, Stevie Prettyman, Chip Dashiell, Gail Bartkovich, Ed Taylor, Larry Dodd and Marvin Long. Sure, their predecessors share some of the blame. They are the primary cause of the revenue cap, the history of no fiscal discipline, the lack of infrastructure investment and the ridiculous land use policy that the county enjoys. But guess what guys; they are not in office any more. You are!
You know there is a problem (actually a series of problems). You know that these problems have existed. You have failed to plan. You have failed to act. What is your excuse? Each member has had ample time to put these issues before the public. If it wasn’t for groups like “We Care†the development issue would not be before the public as it is now. While I don’t agree with VOICE on some issues, the fiscal irresponsibility of the past would not have become the hot button issue that lead to the revenue cap without them. While the revenue cap may have been misguided (a rate cap would have been better, intelligent and competent representation on County Council even better), this is what rises from poor leadership in local government.
There is less than 11 months until the next election. If you really care about your community it’s time to stand up and tell us what you are for (versus only telling us what you are against), and why. If the other members of council won’t join in an open debate of the issues (in order to find solutions), tell us what you propose, and why. Don’t bother giving us quick fix solutions, they most likely won’t work. Show some character, show us that you deserve to viewed as a leader.
If not, don’t be surprised that when you ask us for our votes we respond with “WHY?â€.
Sphere: Related Content



GREAT LETTER IN TODAY’S DAILY TIMES:
East Side slated for phenomenal growth
Citizens on the east side of Route 13, are you aware of the annexation plans Salisbury has in place? Do you know how many new homes are proposed? How about the added traffic?
The plan for annexation stretches from Fruitland north along the bypass and up Brown Road to Leonard Mill Pond, as well as an area east along Snow Hill Road, up to Wor-Wic Community College.
The number of proposed units include: old Salisbury Mall property, 823; Brown Road, 480; Glen Avenue and Gunby Road, 1,315; Aydelotte Farm, 596; South Division Street, 468; Johnson Road, 90; and Snow Hill Road, 1,605. That equals more than 4,300 new homes.
Planning standards use 2.5 persons per unit — almost 11,000 new residents and their vehicles.
Do we need all of this growth and the resulting impact it will have on schools, roads, fire, EMS and police services? What about quality of life and the hassle factor?
Traffic is becoming more and more congested. When the Northeast Collector Road opens, developers expect traffic to triple on College Avenue and Beaglin Park Drive.
That does not take into account traffic generated by new development.
To handle all of this traffic, new roads will be needed and old roadways must be widened. Will eminent domain take your property for road construction?
Our families, friends and neighbors are becoming very concerned about this so-called Smart Growth in and around Salisbury.
If you share our concerns, take the time to contact your local elected representative. Write to The Daily Times.
Add your voice to the growing number of citizens who would like to see slower and better-managed growth.
There is a Web site at http://www.wecarewicomico.org, where you will find more information.
Schools, services and roads are supported by your tax dollars. You and I will pay for added infrastructure to support new growth. Demand the best return on your tax investment. Ask that developers who profit from this growth pay their share of the burden they place on the infrastructure and schools.
Dave Suiter
Interesting! I wish we could even get our newspaper but once again the Daily Times hasn’t been delivered!
Insider: Wonder if you live in Parsonsburg? I saw the DT truck double-timing it eastward down Route 50 to get there about 9:30 or so…I was doing 60-65 and he was pulling away.
DD: Odd that the county doesn’t pitch a b*tch every time Salisbury wants to annex. Unlike Ohio (where I’m from) there’s no township government here to fight annexation at a more local level. A lot of times there’s revenue sharing between the city and township for particularly valuable parcels.
TBT: Wish they would hurry up and open that NE Collector! It would make my life easier. There won’t be that much traffic on it yet until the last part north of the railroad tracks opens. Right now it’s a very wide sidewalk for me when I take my daily strolls.
The county doesnt have any say so over what the City annexes. By law the city can annex whatever they want. How this for irony, the city was dragging their a** on getting their portions of the collector road built so what did they do? They let the county build the second phase that the county was responsible for to a tune of more than a million and then the city waltzed in and annexed it. So they couldnt build it themselves, but they could take it from the county. Not only that, the city will receive all of the highway revenue for that road that jurisdictions receive from the state from the fuel tax. I have thought all along it seemed awful funny that developers, surveyors, and realtors seem to be the main forces behind voice. They have ramrodded this 2 percent cap down everyones throat and I dont believe for a minute that most people truly understand what it does. So no it doesnt suprise me if “Voice” doesnt support something that in some way may be against development or real estate.